Tuhin Talukder (he/him/his), Low Entropy Volunteer Writer
For decades, we measured success through a single lens: growth. How much did I progress from last month? How much higher did we climb from last year? The corporate world glorified constant growth and people took this desire for nonstop achievement to heart. But somewhere along the way, we discovered the cost. Work-life balance fell apart. Depression became epidemic. We missed out on happiness because of our endless need for more.
In response, a necessary correction came forth. People began valuing leisure alongside work. Self-compassion replaced harsh self-criticism when we stumbled. Instead of admonishing ourselves for failures, we learned to treat ourselves with the same kindness we would offer a struggling friend. This shift was vital, because self-criticism causes trauma and unhappiness, while self-compassion enforces emotional strength.
But like any pendulum, it swung too far.
Today, some have weaponized these healthy concepts into shields against effort. “It’s okay not to chase success,” they declare before even attempting the climb. “It’s glorious to lead an ordinary life,” they announce even though they are avoiding chances to grow. What began as wisdom soon turned into something worse: self-serving bias that pretends to be self-compassion.
Understanding Self-Serving Bias
Self-serving bias is a psychological pattern where we associate our successes to internal factors like our hard work, talent and intelligence, while blaming our failures on factors beyond our control, like someone else’s fault, bad timing or unfair circumstances.
In terms of personal growth, self-serving bias shows up as early surrender dressed in the language of wellness. It’s like a peer who claims to value “work-life balance” but never commits fully to projects, then blames the system when overlooked for promotion. It’s the aspiring writer who finishes one draft, faces rejection, then decides they are “choosing contentment over toxic achievement culture” rather than revising and trying again. Or the student who decides “grades don’t define me” without ever studying consistently enough to know their actual potential.
This isn’t self-compassion. It’s self-deception.
The Critical Distinction
Self-compassion means treating yourself kindly when you genuinely struggle despite sincere effort. It acknowledges that failure is part of human life, that being imperfect doesn’t make you less valuable and that problems are chances to learn, rather than proof of your insufficiency. Self-compassion says, “I tried my best, it didn’t work out, but that’s okay. What can I learn from this?”
Self-serving bias, on the other hand, arrives before the struggle even starts. It provokes you to run away from the battlefield. It whispers, “Why so serious, my friend? Choose peace over the rat race.” It makes you feel better without putting in a real effort. While self-compassion heals wounds earned in honest battle, self-serving bias prevents you from entering the battle at the first place.
The tragedy is that self-serving bias borrows the vocabulary of mental wellbeing by saying things like “I’m practicing self-care by not pushing myself,” but often it is the fear of struggle that wears a deceptive mask.
How It Limits Growth
Self-serving bias creates a comfortable prison by convincing us that we’re making conscious, healthy choices when we are actually avoiding challenges. We remain inactive while feeling virtuous about it. We mistake comfort for contentment, avoidance for wisdom.
Consider someone learning a new skill, perhaps a language or a musical instrument. Genuine self-compassion would sound like, “I’ve been practicing for three months and I am still making mistakes. That’s normal. Language learning takes time.” Self-serving bias sounds like, “I tried for two weeks and it’s really hard. I am choosing to respect my limits and not force growth. I am probably just not a language person.”
The difference is clear and this pattern repeats itself throughout our lives. One takes consistent effort, while the other implies minimal effort followed by early withdrawal, defended by comforting psychological argument.
Reclaiming Authentic Growth
True growth requires distinguishing between healthy self-acceptance and convenient self-deception. Contentment with what you have is beautiful only after a genuine effort. Choosing an ordinary life is glorious only when it’s truly the choice made from deep understanding, rather than fear.
The questions we must ask ourselves are, “Am I practicing self-compassion or self-serving bias? Have I genuinely tried and struggled and earned the right to be compassionate with myself? Or am I just avoiding the struggle and convincing myself with soothing language?”
Growth doesn’t require sacrificing happiness or work-life balance. But it does require honesty. It demands that we try the best we can before we grant ourselves the permission to stop. It asks us to distinguish between the wisdom of knowing our limits and the cowardice of never testing them. The path of growth requires us to recognize that self-serving bias and self-compassion are not the same thing. Knowing the difference between the two might be the most important growth we could ever achieve.
—
Tuhin Talukder is a newcomer to Canada navigating the challenges and joys of building a new life. He has a passion for storytelling and writing, drawing meaning from everyday moments of connection, compassion and cultural adaptation. His work often blends science, nature and conscience, lingering on the choices that define us.